Files
corona/reshare/complaint.go
T
Hanzo AI a2c1d1da31 corona: symmetric domain separation — PULSAR-* tags -> CORONA-*
Leftover from Corona's "Pulsar-R" lineage. Pulsar (M-LWE) and Corona
(R-LWE) are independent constructions with separate hardness assumptions,
so their cSHAKE personalisation strings must be distinct.

Changes (Go, non-luxcpp):
  - hash tags: PULSAR-HC-v1 -> CORONA-HC-v1, etc. (HU, TRANSCRIPT, PRF, MAC, PAIRWISE)
  - profile IDs: "Pulsar-SHA3" -> "Corona-SHA3", "Pulsar-BLAKE3" -> "Corona-BLAKE3"
  - context strings: pulsar.dkg2.A.v1 -> corona.dkg2.A.v1, etc.
  - env vars: PULSAR_RESHARE_KAT_PATH -> CORONA_RESHARE_KAT_PATH, etc.
  - struct names: pulsarSHA3 -> coronaSHA3
  - KAT derive roots: sign_e2e_pulsar -> sign_e2e_corona

What's preserved (different scope):
  - luxcpp/crypto/pulsar/* path references in comments (separate repo,
    out of scope; the C++ side will rename in its own commit)
  - Cross-runtime KAT files on disk (will regenerate next CI run)

All 11 packages test green: dkg, dkg2, hash, keyera, networking,
primitives, reshare, sign, threshold, utils, wire.
2026-05-13 14:19:13 -07:00

293 lines
11 KiB
Go

// Copyright (C) 2025-2026, Lux Industries Inc. All rights reserved.
// See the file LICENSE for licensing terms.
package reshare
// Complaint workflow and disqualification logic for VSR.
//
// During Round 1, every old (or refresh-participating) party i broadcasts
// its commitment vector C_i and privately delivers (share_{i→j},
// blind_{i→j}) to every recipient j. In Round 1.5, every recipient j
// independently runs VerifyShareAgainstCommits — if any check fails, j
// emits a signed Complaint naming sender i and the failing slot.
//
// The complaint workflow exists for three failure modes:
//
// (a) Bad delivery — sender i ships a (share, blind) pair that does
// not satisfy the commitment equation. Either i mis-computed,
// or i deliberately ships a poisoned share (mobile-adversary
// strategy: coerce a recipient to recompute the secret with
// offset to leak it later).
//
// (b) Cross-recipient equivocation — sender i ships commits C_a to
// recipient a and a different C_b to recipient b. Detected via
// the CommitDigest broadcast in Round 1.5: if a's digest from i
// ≠ b's digest from i (after cross-broadcast), i has equivocated.
//
// (c) Silence — sender i fails to deliver to recipient j by the
// Round 1 deadline. Detected by absence in j's view; j broadcasts
// a "missing share" complaint.
//
// Disqualification rule (deterministic, identical on every honest party):
//
// - Complaints from the same complainer about the same sender are
// deduplicated by (sender, complainer) tuple.
// - A sender i is DISQUALIFIED iff at least DisqualificationThreshold
// distinct complainers signed valid complaints against i. The
// default threshold is t_old - 1 (so that an honest majority of
// the qualified set always achieves disqualification of a
// sufficiently misbehaving sender).
// - After the Round 2 deadline, every honest party computes the
// SAME set Q' = Q \ {disqualified senders} and uses it as the new
// quorum. Lagrange coefficients λ^{Q'}_i are recomputed against
// Q', not Q.
// - If |Q'| < t_old, the resharing FAILS and the chain stays at the
// old epoch. The activation circuit-breaker (activation.go)
// enforces this.
//
// Slashing evidence: every signed Complaint against a misbehaving
// sender, plus the equivocation pair (commits_a, commits_b) where
// applicable, is admissible as slashing evidence at the Quasar layer
// (see quasar_integration.go for the wire format).
import (
"bytes"
"crypto/ed25519"
"encoding/binary"
"errors"
"fmt"
"github.com/zeebo/blake3"
)
// ComplaintReason enumerates the failure modes that justify a complaint.
type ComplaintReason uint8
const (
// ComplaintBadDelivery — share_{i→j} fails the commitment check.
ComplaintBadDelivery ComplaintReason = 1
// ComplaintEquivocation — sender i shipped different commits to
// different recipients (detected via Round 1.5 digest cross-check).
ComplaintEquivocation ComplaintReason = 2
// ComplaintMissing — sender i failed to deliver share_{i→j} by
// the round-1 deadline.
ComplaintMissing ComplaintReason = 3
// ComplaintMalformedCommit — sender i's commit vector has the
// wrong length, has nil entries, or fails internal sanity checks.
ComplaintMalformedCommit ComplaintReason = 4
)
// String returns a human-readable name for the reason.
func (r ComplaintReason) String() string {
switch r {
case ComplaintBadDelivery:
return "bad-delivery"
case ComplaintEquivocation:
return "equivocation"
case ComplaintMissing:
return "missing"
case ComplaintMalformedCommit:
return "malformed-commit"
default:
return fmt.Sprintf("unknown(%d)", r)
}
}
// Complaint is a signed assertion that sender PartyID misbehaved
// during the resharing protocol.
//
// SenderID is the misbehaving old-committee party (the dealer).
// ComplainerID is the new-committee party that observed the failure
// and signs the complaint.
//
// TranscriptHash binds the complaint to a specific reshare invocation
// (see transcript.go). A complaint with a stale or wrong transcript
// hash is rejected.
//
// Evidence carries the protocol-specific data the chain needs to
// adjudicate the complaint:
//
// - For ComplaintBadDelivery: the (share, blind) pair received by
// ComplainerID, plus the SenderID's commit vector. Any honest
// party can re-run VerifyShareAgainstCommits and confirm the
// mismatch.
// - For ComplaintEquivocation: two commit-digest signed broadcasts
// from SenderID with different digests. Both signed under
// SenderID's wire identity key; the contradiction is self-
// evident.
// - For ComplaintMissing: empty (the absence is the evidence).
// A separate liveness round provides timing context.
// - For ComplaintMalformedCommit: the malformed commit vector.
type Complaint struct {
TranscriptHash [32]byte
SenderID int // 1-indexed party ID of the misbehaving dealer
ComplainerID int // 1-indexed party ID of the complainer
Reason ComplaintReason
Evidence []byte // canonical-serialized evidence (see above)
Signature []byte // Ed25519 signature over Bytes() under ComplainerID's wire key
ComplainerKey ed25519.PublicKey // public key for verification
}
// Bytes returns the canonical signed payload for a complaint. The
// Signature field is excluded (it is computed OVER these bytes).
//
// Format:
//
// "corona.reshare.complaint.v1" || transcript || sender_id_be32 ||
// complainer_id_be32 || reason_u8 || evidence_len_be32 || evidence
func (c *Complaint) Bytes() []byte {
var buf bytes.Buffer
buf.WriteString("corona.reshare.complaint.v1")
buf.Write(c.TranscriptHash[:])
var b4 [4]byte
binary.BigEndian.PutUint32(b4[:], uint32(c.SenderID))
buf.Write(b4[:])
binary.BigEndian.PutUint32(b4[:], uint32(c.ComplainerID))
buf.Write(b4[:])
buf.WriteByte(byte(c.Reason))
binary.BigEndian.PutUint32(b4[:], uint32(len(c.Evidence)))
buf.Write(b4[:])
buf.Write(c.Evidence)
return buf.Bytes()
}
// Sign produces a complaint signature using the provided Ed25519
// private key. Callers MUST use the wire-identity key associated with
// ComplainerID — using a different key produces a complaint that
// other validators reject.
func (c *Complaint) Sign(priv ed25519.PrivateKey) {
c.Signature = ed25519.Sign(priv, c.Bytes())
c.ComplainerKey = priv.Public().(ed25519.PublicKey)
}
// Verify checks the Ed25519 signature against ComplainerKey. Returns
// nil iff the signature is valid. Note: this does NOT verify that the
// complaint's reason actually holds (e.g. for ComplaintBadDelivery
// the evidence must be re-checked separately) — only that the
// complaint was signed by the claimed complainer.
func (c *Complaint) Verify() error {
if c == nil || len(c.Signature) == 0 || len(c.ComplainerKey) == 0 {
return errors.New("reshare: complaint missing signature or key")
}
if !ed25519.Verify(c.ComplainerKey, c.Bytes(), c.Signature) {
return errors.New("reshare: complaint signature invalid")
}
return nil
}
// ComplaintHash returns BLAKE3 over the complaint's canonical bytes
// (signature included). Used by the resharing transcript to commit
// to the SET of complaints and the activation message to bind to the
// final disqualification result.
func ComplaintHash(c *Complaint) [32]byte {
h := blake3.New()
_, _ = h.Write([]byte("corona.reshare.complaint-hash.v1"))
_, _ = h.Write(c.Bytes())
_, _ = h.Write(c.Signature)
var out [32]byte
copy(out[:], h.Sum(nil)[:32])
return out
}
// DisqualificationThreshold returns the minimum number of distinct,
// validly-signed complaints needed to disqualify a sender.
//
// Default: t_old - 1. Rationale: any single Byzantine validator can
// emit one false complaint to slow the protocol, but to disqualify
// an honest sender the adversary needs t_old - 1 collaborators —
// exceeding the static-corruption threshold of t_old - 1 by exactly
// one. So no honest sender can be disqualified by a maximally
// adversarial complainer set.
//
// For Refresh, the threshold is t - 1 (same logic: t parties form
// the quorum; t-1 is the corruption bound).
func DisqualificationThreshold(thresholdOld int) int {
if thresholdOld <= 1 {
return 1
}
return thresholdOld - 1
}
// ComputeDisqualifiedSet takes a slice of validated complaints and
// returns the set of sender IDs that meet the disqualification
// threshold. Every honest party that processes the same complaint set
// returns the same disqualified set — this determinism is essential
// for the new committee to compute a consistent quorum Q'.
//
// "Validated" means: the complaint's signature has been verified, the
// complaint's transcript hash matches the local view, and (for
// ComplaintBadDelivery / ComplaintEquivocation) the evidence has been
// re-checked and confirms the misbehaviour. This function does NOT
// re-verify the underlying claim — that is the caller's job (see
// VerifyComplaint helpers in the integration layer).
//
// Complaints are deduplicated by (sender, complainer) tuple; if the
// same complainer signs two complaints against the same sender (e.g.
// for different reasons), only one counts toward the threshold.
func ComputeDisqualifiedSet(
complaints []*Complaint,
thresholdOld int,
) map[int]struct{} {
threshold := DisqualificationThreshold(thresholdOld)
// (sender, complainer) → seen
seen := make(map[[2]int]bool)
// sender → number of distinct complainers
count := make(map[int]int)
for _, c := range complaints {
key := [2]int{c.SenderID, c.ComplainerID}
if seen[key] {
continue
}
seen[key] = true
count[c.SenderID]++
}
out := make(map[int]struct{})
for sender, n := range count {
if n >= threshold {
out[sender] = struct{}{}
}
}
return out
}
// FilterQualifiedQuorum returns the survivor set Q' = Q \ disqualified.
// Returns ErrInsufficientQuorum if |Q'| < tOld. Otherwise returns
// the (deterministic) sorted slice of surviving party IDs.
//
// This is the exact set the new committee uses to compute Lagrange
// coefficients for the re-shared shares — an inconsistency here
// produces shares that interpolate to a DIFFERENT secret on different
// new validators, which immediately fails the activation cert.
func FilterQualifiedQuorum(
originalQuorum []int,
disqualified map[int]struct{},
tOld int,
) ([]int, error) {
out := make([]int, 0, len(originalQuorum))
for _, id := range originalQuorum {
if _, dq := disqualified[id]; dq {
continue
}
out = append(out, id)
}
if len(out) < tOld {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("%w: %d survivors < threshold %d",
ErrInsufficientQuorum, len(out), tOld)
}
// Sort ascending for determinism.
for i := 1; i < len(out); i++ {
for j := i; j > 0 && out[j-1] > out[j]; j-- {
out[j-1], out[j] = out[j], out[j-1]
}
}
return out, nil
}
// ErrInsufficientQuorum signals that too many resharing parties were
// disqualified for the protocol to recover. The chain MUST stay at
// the old epoch when this error is returned (see activation.go).
var ErrInsufficientQuorum = errors.New("reshare: qualified quorum below t_old after disqualification")