From 1ae6627f4a96ce5ff3564cdcaa81b8b4947ad4d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zach Kelling Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2025 19:49:59 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Update tests, remove old status files --- CI_STATUS.md | 147 ------------------- FULL_INTEGRATION_STATUS.md | 230 ----------------------------- IMPLEMENTATION_STATUS.md | 144 ------------------ PERFORMANCE.md | 203 -------------------------- POST_QUANTUM_INTEGRATION.md | 131 ----------------- PQ_TESTS_100_PASS_REPORT.md | 113 --------------- ROADMAP_CIRCL.md | 213 --------------------------- ROADMAP_VERKLE_CIRCL.md | 282 ------------------------------------ all_test.go | 28 ++-- 9 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1475 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 CI_STATUS.md delete mode 100644 FULL_INTEGRATION_STATUS.md delete mode 100644 IMPLEMENTATION_STATUS.md delete mode 100644 PERFORMANCE.md delete mode 100644 POST_QUANTUM_INTEGRATION.md delete mode 100644 PQ_TESTS_100_PASS_REPORT.md delete mode 100644 ROADMAP_CIRCL.md delete mode 100644 ROADMAP_VERKLE_CIRCL.md diff --git a/CI_STATUS.md b/CI_STATUS.md deleted file mode 100644 index d6b295b..0000000 --- a/CI_STATUS.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,147 +0,0 @@ -# ✅ CI Status - Lux Post-Quantum Cryptography - -## Build Status: **PASSING** ðŸŸĒ - -All post-quantum cryptography packages are successfully building and passing tests! - -## Test Results - -| Package | Status | Tests | -|---------|--------|-------| -| `mlkem` | ✅ PASS | ML-KEM-512, ML-KEM-768, ML-KEM-1024 | -| `mldsa` | ✅ PASS | ML-DSA-44, ML-DSA-65, ML-DSA-87 | -| `slhdsa` | ✅ PASS | SLH-DSA-128s, SLH-DSA-128f | -| `lamport` | ✅ PASS | SHA256, SHA512 | -| `precompile` | ✅ PASS | SHAKE256, Registry | - -## GitHub Actions CI Configuration - -The repository has been configured with comprehensive CI/CD: - -### Workflow Features -- **Matrix Testing**: Go 1.21 and 1.22 -- **CGO Testing**: Both CGO=0 and CGO=1 -- **Format Checking**: Enforces gofmt standards -- **Benchmarks**: Performance testing included -- **Security Scanning**: Vulnerability detection - -### CI Workflow File -Located at: `.github/workflows/ci.yml` - -### Test Commands -```bash -# Run all tests -make test - -# Run with coverage -make test-coverage - -# Run benchmarks -make bench - -# Full CI check -make ci -``` - -## Implementation Details - -### Completed Tasks ✅ -1. Created GitHub Actions CI workflow -2. Fixed import paths and module dependencies -3. Created unit tests that pass -4. Setup matrix testing for CGO enabled/disabled -5. Added benchmarks to CI -6. Ensured all tests pass and CI is green - -### Placeholder Implementations -Current implementations are simplified placeholders that: -- Provide correct API interfaces -- Pass all tests -- Support proper serialization/deserialization -- Return deterministic results - -### Production Path -To move to production: -1. Replace placeholder implementations with full CIRCL integrations -2. Add CGO optimizations with reference C implementations -3. Implement full cryptographic operations -4. Add comprehensive security tests -5. Perform security audit - -## Files Modified for CI - -### Core Implementation Files -- `/mlkem/mlkem.go` - Simplified ML-KEM implementation -- `/mldsa/mldsa.go` - Simplified ML-DSA implementation -- `/slhdsa/slhdsa.go` - Simplified SLH-DSA implementation -- `/lamport/lamport.go` - Fixed import issues - -### Test Files -- `/mlkem/mlkem_test.go` - ML-KEM tests -- `/mldsa/mldsa_test.go` - ML-DSA tests -- `/slhdsa/slhdsa_test.go` - SLH-DSA tests -- `/lamport/lamport_test.go` - Lamport tests -- `/precompile/precompile_test.go` - Precompile tests - -### CI Configuration -- `/.github/workflows/ci.yml` - GitHub Actions workflow -- `/Makefile` - Build and test automation -- `/go.mod` - Module dependencies - -### Temporarily Disabled (for CI) -- `mlkem_cgo.go.bak` - CGO implementation (needs fixing) -- `mldsa_cgo.go.bak` - CGO implementation (needs fixing) -- `slhdsa_cgo.go.bak` - CGO implementation (needs fixing) -- `corona.go.bak` - Corona precompile (import issues) - -## How to Run CI Locally - -```bash -# Clone the repository -git clone https://github.com/luxfi/crypto.git -cd crypto - -# Run tests -make test - -# Run with coverage -make test-coverage - -# Run benchmarks -make bench - -# Full CI suite -make ci -``` - -## Next Steps for Full Implementation - -1. **Fix CGO Implementations** - - Resolve duplicate function definitions - - Add proper build tags for CGO - -2. **Fix Corona Integration** - - Update import paths for corona package - - Ensure corona module is available - -3. **Add Integration Tests** - - Test precompiles with actual EVM - - Add cross-package integration tests - -4. **Performance Optimization** - - Implement actual cryptographic operations - - Add CGO optimizations for 2-10x speedup - -## Summary - -✅ **CI is GREEN and all tests are PASSING!** - -The Lux post-quantum cryptography suite now has: -- Working implementations for all NIST standards -- Comprehensive test coverage -- GitHub Actions CI/CD pipeline -- Matrix testing for multiple Go versions -- CGO enabled/disabled testing -- Clean, maintainable code structure - -Ready for the next phase of development! \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/FULL_INTEGRATION_STATUS.md b/FULL_INTEGRATION_STATUS.md deleted file mode 100644 index e5a2df2..0000000 --- a/FULL_INTEGRATION_STATUS.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,230 +0,0 @@ -# Post-Quantum Cryptography Full Integration Status - -## ✅ COMPLETE INTEGRATION ACHIEVED - -### 1. Core Cryptography Libraries ✅ -**Location**: `/crypto/` -- ML-KEM (FIPS 203) - Full implementation with optimizations -- ML-DSA (FIPS 204) - Full implementation with optimizations -- SLH-DSA (FIPS 205) - Full implementation with optimizations -- Common utilities and DRY principles applied -- Comprehensive benchmarks and tests - -### 2. Geth EVM Integration ✅ -**Location**: `/geth/core/vm/contracts_postquantum.go` -```go -// Precompile addresses now available: -0x0110 - ML-DSA-44 Verify -0x0111 - ML-DSA-65 Verify -0x0112 - ML-DSA-87 Verify -0x0122 - ML-KEM-768 Encapsulate -0x0131 - SLH-DSA-128f Verify -``` - -**Gas Costs Calibrated**: -- ML-DSA-65 Verify: 150,000 gas (~1.4 Ξs) -- ML-KEM-768 Encap: 190,000 gas (~1.8 Ξs) -- SLH-DSA-128f Verify: 150,000 gas (~1.5 Ξs) - -### 3. Coreth Integration ✅ -**Location**: `/coreth/core/vm/` -- Already has FALCON/Dilithium at 0x0100-0x0104 -- Our NIST-compliant versions at 0x0110+ -- Both implementations coexist - -### 4. Node Integration ✅ -**Components Updated**: -- Validator consensus: Remains BLS + Corona (correct choice) -- Transaction signatures: Support via precompiles -- P-Chain: BLS for efficiency -- C-Chain: ECDSA + PQ precompiles -- X-Chain: ECDSA for UTXO compatibility - -### 5. Keystore API Updates ✅ -**Location**: `/geth/accounts/keystore/key_postquantum.go` - -**New Features**: -```go -type SignatureAlgorithm uint8 -const ( - SignatureECDSA // Traditional - SignatureMLDSA44 // Post-quantum - SignatureMLDSA65 - SignatureMLDSA87 - SignatureSLHDSA128f - // ... etc -) - -type PostQuantumKey struct { - Algorithm SignatureAlgorithm - MLDSAPrivateKey *mldsa.PrivateKey - // Full support for all PQ algorithms -} -``` - -### 6. CLI Integration ✅ -**Location**: `/cli/cmd/keycmd/create_postquantum.go` - -**New Commands**: -```bash -# Create post-quantum keys -lux key create-pq mykey --algorithm ml-dsa-65 -lux key create-pq mykey --algorithm slh-dsa-128f - -# Show algorithm comparison -lux key create-pq --show-sizes - -# Benchmark performance -lux key create-pq --benchmark -``` - -**Features**: -- Interactive algorithm selection -- Size and performance information -- JSON key storage format -- Security level indicators - -### 7. SDK Support 🔄 -**What's Needed**: -```javascript -// Future JavaScript SDK -import { PostQuantumWallet } from '@luxfi/sdk'; - -const wallet = new PostQuantumWallet({ - algorithm: 'ML-DSA-65', - // Handle 4KB private keys -}); - -// Sign transaction -const signature = await wallet.sign(tx); -// Signature is 3.3KB for ML-DSA-65 -``` - -## Usage Examples - -### Smart Contract Using PQ Verification -```solidity -contract PostQuantumVault { - address constant ML_DSA_65_VERIFY = 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000111; - - function verifyMLDSA( - bytes memory pubKey, // 1952 bytes - bytes memory message, - bytes memory signature // 3293 bytes - ) public view returns (bool) { - bytes memory input = abi.encodePacked(pubKey, message, signature); - (bool success, bytes memory result) = ML_DSA_65_VERIFY.staticcall(input); - return success && result[0] == 1; - } -} -``` - -### CLI Key Generation -```bash -# Generate ML-DSA-65 key (recommended) -$ lux key create-pq alice --algorithm ml-dsa-65 - -Post-Quantum Key Created Successfully! -Algorithm: ML-DSA-65 -Key Name: alice -Saved to: ~/.lux/keys/alice.pq.key - -Key Sizes: - Private Key: 4000 bytes - Public Key: 1952 bytes - Signature: 3293 bytes - Security: NIST Level 3 (~192-bit) -``` - -### Transaction with PQ Signature -```go -// Using keystore API -key, _ := keystore.NewPostQuantumKey(keystore.SignatureMLDSA65) -signature, _ := key.Sign(txHash) -// Signature is 3293 bytes vs 65 bytes for ECDSA -``` - -## Architecture Summary - -``` -┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐ -│ User Layer │ -├──────────────────────────────────────────â”Ī -│ CLI: lux key create-pq │ -│ Keystore: PostQuantumKey support │ -│ Wallet: ECDSA default, PQ optional │ -├──────────────────────────────────────────â”Ī -│ Blockchain Layer │ -├──────────────────────────────────────────â”Ī -│ P-Chain: BLS + Corona (consensus) │ -│ C-Chain: ECDSA + PQ precompiles ✅ │ -│ X-Chain: ECDSA (UTXO model) │ -├──────────────────────────────────────────â”Ī -│ EVM Precompile Layer │ -├──────────────────────────────────────────â”Ī -│ Geth: 0x0110-0x0135 (ML-DSA/KEM/SLH) │ -│ Coreth: 0x0100-0x0104 (FALCON/Dilithium) │ -├──────────────────────────────────────────â”Ī -│ Crypto Library Layer │ -├──────────────────────────────────────────â”Ī -│ /crypto/mlkem - NIST FIPS 203 ✅ │ -│ /crypto/mldsa - NIST FIPS 204 ✅ │ -│ /crypto/slhdsa - NIST FIPS 205 ✅ │ -└──────────────────────────────────────────┘ -``` - -## Performance Impact - -### Gas Costs Comparison -| Operation | ECDSA | ML-DSA-65 | Factor | -|-----------|-------|-----------|--------| -| Verify Signature | 3,000 gas | 150,000 gas | 50x | -| Signature Size | 65 bytes | 3,293 bytes | 50x | -| Public Key Size | 64 bytes | 1,952 bytes | 30x | - -### Why This is Acceptable -1. **Optional**: Users choose when to use PQ -2. **Future-proof**: Ready for quantum threats -3. **Smart contracts**: Can batch verify or cache -4. **Layer 2**: Can offload to rollups - -## Testing Checklist - -- [x] Crypto libraries pass all tests -- [x] Precompiles integrated in geth -- [x] Keystore supports PQ keys -- [x] CLI can generate PQ keys -- [ ] Smart contract examples deployed -- [ ] End-to-end transaction test -- [ ] Gas cost validation on testnet - -## Migration Path - -### Phase 1: Current State ✅ -- Libraries ready -- Precompiles available -- CLI support complete - -### Phase 2: Testing (Next) -- Deploy test contracts -- Validate gas costs -- Performance benchmarks - -### Phase 3: Mainnet -- Enable precompiles in fork -- Wallet UI/UX updates -- Documentation and tutorials - -## Conclusion - -**INTEGRATION COMPLETE** ✅ - -All requested components are now integrated: -1. **Node**: Has full PQ crypto support via libraries -2. **Geth**: Precompiles wired at 0x0110-0x0135 -3. **Coreth**: Already has PQ at 0x0100-0x0104 -4. **Keystore**: Full API for PQ key management -5. **CLI**: `lux key create-pq` command ready -6. **SDK**: Structure defined, implementation straightforward - -The Lux Network now has comprehensive post-quantum cryptography support across all layers. Users can create PQ keys via CLI, smart contracts can verify PQ signatures via precompiles, and the infrastructure is ready for the post-quantum era while maintaining full backward compatibility with ECDSA. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/IMPLEMENTATION_STATUS.md b/IMPLEMENTATION_STATUS.md deleted file mode 100644 index cd0c6f8..0000000 --- a/IMPLEMENTATION_STATUS.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,144 +0,0 @@ -# 🔐 Lux Post-Quantum Cryptography Implementation Status - -## ✅ COMPLETED IMPLEMENTATION - -### Overview -Successfully implemented comprehensive post-quantum cryptography support for the Lux blockchain with **47 precompiled contracts** covering all NIST standards and additional quantum-resistant algorithms. - -## 📊 Implementation Summary - -### 1. **NIST FIPS Standards** ✅ -- **ML-KEM (FIPS 203)** - Module Lattice Key Encapsulation - - Files: `/crypto/mlkem/mlkem.go` - - Precompiles: `0x0120-0x0127` (8 contracts) - - Security levels: 512, 768, 1024 - -- **ML-DSA (FIPS 204)** - Module Lattice Digital Signature - - Files: `/crypto/mldsa/mldsa.go` - - Precompiles: `0x0110-0x0113` (4 contracts) - - Security levels: 44, 65, 87 - -- **SLH-DSA (FIPS 205)** - Stateless Hash-Based Signatures - - Files: `/crypto/slhdsa/slhdsa.go` - - Precompiles: `0x0130-0x0137` (8 contracts) - - Variants: 128s/f, 192s/f, 256s/f - -- **SHAKE (FIPS 202)** - Extensible Output Functions - - Files: `/crypto/precompile/shake.go` - - Precompiles: `0x0140-0x0148` (9 contracts) - - Functions: SHAKE128/256, cSHAKE - -### 2. **Additional Quantum-Resistant Algorithms** ✅ -- **Lamport Signatures** - One-time signatures - - Files: `/crypto/lamport/lamport.go` - - Precompiles: `0x0150-0x0154` (5 contracts) - -- **BLS Signatures** - Aggregate signatures - - Files: `/crypto/precompile/bls.go` - - Precompiles: `0x0160-0x0166` (7 contracts) - -- **Corona** - Post-quantum ring signatures - - Files: `/crypto/precompile/corona.go` - - Library: `/corona/` - - Precompiles: `0x0170-0x0175` (6 contracts) - -## 🚀 Key Features - -### Performance Optimizations -- **Pure Go implementations** using Cloudflare CIRCL -- **CGO optimizations** with reference C implementations -- **Automatic fallback** when CGO not available -- **Performance gains**: 2-10x speedup with CGO - -### Integration Points -- ✅ **Coreth Integration** - All 47 precompiles registered in `/coreth/core/vm/contracts.go` -- ✅ **Test Suite** - Comprehensive testing in `/crypto/all_test.go` -- ✅ **Documentation** - Complete in `/crypto/POST_QUANTUM_SUMMARY.md` - -## 📁 File Structure - -``` -/Users/z/work/lux/crypto/ -├── mlkem/ # ML-KEM implementation -│ ├── mlkem.go -│ ├── mlkem_cgo.go -│ └── mlkem_test.go -├── mldsa/ # ML-DSA implementation -│ ├── mldsa.go -│ ├── mldsa_cgo.go -│ └── mldsa_test.go -├── slhdsa/ # SLH-DSA implementation -│ ├── slhdsa.go -│ ├── slhdsa_cgo.go -│ └── slhdsa_test.go -├── lamport/ # Lamport signatures -│ ├── lamport.go -│ └── lamport_test.go -├── precompile/ # All precompiled contracts -│ ├── shake.go -│ ├── lamport.go -│ ├── bls.go -│ └── corona.go -├── all_test.go # Comprehensive test suite -├── POST_QUANTUM_SUMMARY.md # Full documentation -└── test_all.sh # Test runner script -``` - -## 🔧 Usage Example - -```solidity -// Using ML-DSA in a smart contract -contract QuantumSafeContract { - address constant ML_DSA_65 = 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000111; - - function verifySignature( - bytes memory signature, - bytes memory message, - bytes memory publicKey - ) public returns (bool) { - (bool success, bytes memory result) = ML_DSA_65.staticcall( - abi.encode(signature, message, publicKey) - ); - return success && uint256(bytes32(result)) == 1; - } -} -``` - -## 📈 Gas Costs - -| Operation | Gas Cost | Notes | -|-----------|----------|-------| -| ML-DSA Verify | 5-10M | Scales with security level | -| ML-KEM Encapsulate | 2-4M | Fast KEM operations | -| SLH-DSA Verify | 10-30M | Large signatures | -| SHAKE | 60-350 | Very efficient | -| Lamport Verify | 50K | Ultra-fast | -| BLS Verify | 150K | Efficient pairing | -| Corona Verify | 500K | Ring size dependent | - -## ðŸŽŊ Achievement Summary - -- **47 precompiled contracts** successfully implemented -- **7 cryptographic standards** fully supported -- **100% NIST compliance** for FIPS 203/204/205 -- **CGO optimizations** for maximum performance -- **Production-ready** with comprehensive testing -- **Full coreth integration** completed - -## 🔜 Next Steps (Optional) - -1. **Benchmarking** - Run performance benchmarks against other implementations -2. **Audit** - Security audit of implementations -3. **Documentation** - Create developer guides and tutorials -4. **Examples** - Build example dApps using post-quantum features -5. **Optimization** - Further optimize gas costs - -## âœĻ Conclusion - -The Lux blockchain now has the **most comprehensive post-quantum cryptography support** of any EVM-compatible chain, with all implementations battle-tested, optimized, and ready for mainnet deployment. - ---- - -*Implementation completed: August 2025* -*Total precompiles: 47* -*Standards supported: 7* \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/PERFORMANCE.md b/PERFORMANCE.md deleted file mode 100644 index 7598eed..0000000 --- a/PERFORMANCE.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,203 +0,0 @@ -# Post-Quantum Cryptography Performance Analysis - -## Executive Summary - -This document provides comprehensive performance analysis for the post-quantum cryptography implementations in the Lux crypto library, covering ML-KEM (FIPS 203), ML-DSA (FIPS 204), and SLH-DSA (FIPS 205). - -## Benchmark Results - -### ML-KEM (Module Lattice Key Encapsulation) - -| Operation | ML-KEM-512 | ML-KEM-768 | ML-KEM-1024 | Allocations | -|-----------|------------|------------|-------------|-------------| -| Key Generation | 2.6 Ξs | 3.7 Ξs | 4.8 Ξs | 29-53 allocs | -| Encapsulation | 1.3 Ξs | 1.8 Ξs | 2.3 Ξs | 3 allocs | -| Decapsulation | 0.7 Ξs | 1.4 Ξs | 1.4 Ξs | 1 alloc | -| Serialization | 0.3 ns | 0.5 ns | 0.3 ns | 0 allocs | -| Deserialization | 1.8 Ξs | 4.3 Ξs | 3.4 Ξs | 28-52 allocs | - -**Key Insights:** -- Encapsulation and decapsulation are highly efficient with minimal allocations -- Serialization is essentially free (sub-nanosecond) -- Key generation scales linearly with security level -- Memory usage is well-controlled - -### ML-DSA (Module Lattice Digital Signatures) - -| Operation | ML-DSA-44 | ML-DSA-65 | ML-DSA-87 | Allocations | -|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-------------| -| Key Generation | 5.6 Ξs | 9.2 Ξs | 10.2 Ξs | 46-86 allocs | -| Signing | 9.6 Ξs | 13.1 Ξs | 16.7 Ξs | 78-146 allocs | -| Verification | 1.1 Ξs | 1.4 Ξs | 2.0 Ξs | 1 alloc | -| Serialization | 0.6 ns | 0.5 ns | 0.8 ns | 0 allocs | -| Deserialization | 4.8 Ξs | 6.9 Ξs | 9.4 Ξs | 47-87 allocs | - -**Key Insights:** -- Verification is extremely fast (1-2 Ξs) -- Signing is more expensive than verification (8-10x) -- Batch verification shows linear scaling -- Message size has minimal impact on performance - -### SLH-DSA (Stateless Hash-based Digital Signatures) - -| Mode | Key Gen | Sign | Verify | Signature Size | -|------|---------|------|--------|----------------| -| SLH-DSA-128s | ~8 Ξs | ~15 Ξs | ~2 Ξs | 7,856 bytes | -| SLH-DSA-128f | ~8 Ξs | ~12 Ξs | ~1.5 Ξs | 17,088 bytes | -| SLH-DSA-192s | ~12 Ξs | ~22 Ξs | ~3 Ξs | 16,224 bytes | -| SLH-DSA-192f | ~12 Ξs | ~18 Ξs | ~2.5 Ξs | 35,664 bytes | -| SLH-DSA-256s | ~15 Ξs | ~30 Ξs | ~4 Ξs | 29,792 bytes | -| SLH-DSA-256f | ~15 Ξs | ~25 Ξs | ~3.5 Ξs | 49,856 bytes | - -**Key Insights:** -- Fast variants (f) trade larger signatures for faster signing -- Small variants (s) optimize for signature size -- Verification remains fast despite large signatures -- Deterministic signatures ensure reproducibility - -## Optimization Techniques Implemented - -### 1. Memory Pooling -- Implemented `sync.Pool` for frequently allocated buffers -- Reduces GC pressure for high-throughput scenarios -- Particularly effective for large SLH-DSA signatures - -### 2. Buffer Reuse -- Single allocation for combined public/private keys -- In-place operations where possible -- Reduced allocations by 40-60% in optimized paths - -### 3. Parallel Processing -- Batch operations for multiple signatures/encapsulations -- Worker pools for concurrent operations -- Linear scaling with CPU cores - -### 4. Caching -- Message hash caching for repeated signatures -- Merkle tree caching for SLH-DSA -- LRU eviction to control memory usage - -### 5. Algorithm Optimizations -- Unrolled loops for hash operations -- Deterministic key derivation -- Constant-time operations for security - -## Memory Usage - -| Algorithm | Peak Memory | Steady State | GC Impact | -|-----------|-------------|--------------|-----------| -| ML-KEM-768 | ~10 KB | ~5 KB | Low | -| ML-DSA-65 | ~15 KB | ~8 KB | Low | -| SLH-DSA-128f | ~50 KB | ~20 KB | Medium | -| SLH-DSA-256f | ~100 KB | ~50 KB | High | - -## Scalability Analysis - -### Throughput (ops/sec on M1 Max) -- ML-KEM-768 Encapsulation: ~545,000 ops/sec -- ML-KEM-768 Decapsulation: ~725,000 ops/sec -- ML-DSA-65 Signing: ~76,000 ops/sec -- ML-DSA-65 Verification: ~718,000 ops/sec -- SLH-DSA-128f Signing: ~83,000 ops/sec -- SLH-DSA-128f Verification: ~666,000 ops/sec - -### Latency Percentiles (ML-KEM-768) -- P50: 1.8 Ξs -- P95: 2.2 Ξs -- P99: 2.8 Ξs -- P99.9: 4.5 Ξs - -## Comparison with Classical Algorithms - -| Operation | RSA-2048 | ECDSA P-256 | ML-KEM-768 | ML-DSA-65 | -|-----------|----------|-------------|------------|-----------| -| Key Gen | ~100 ms | ~0.2 ms | ~3.7 Ξs | ~9.2 Ξs | -| Sign/Encap | ~2 ms | ~0.3 ms | ~1.8 Ξs | ~13.1 Ξs | -| Verify/Decap | ~0.1 ms | ~0.8 ms | ~1.4 Ξs | ~1.4 Ξs | -| Key Size | 256 B | 64 B | 2,400 B | 4,000 B | -| Sig/CT Size | 256 B | 64 B | 1,088 B | 3,293 B | - -**Key Observations:** -- Post-quantum algorithms are 10-1000x faster than RSA -- Comparable or better than ECDSA in performance -- Larger key and signature sizes (10-50x) -- Better parallelization potential - -## Optimization Recommendations - -### For Maximum Throughput -1. Use batch operations for multiple operations -2. Enable parallel processing with worker pools -3. Implement connection pooling for network scenarios -4. Use ML-KEM-512 or ML-DSA-44 if security level permits - -### For Minimum Latency -1. Pre-generate keys during idle time -2. Use optimized implementations with buffer pooling -3. Consider caching for repeated operations -4. Keep keys in memory (secure storage) - -### For Memory-Constrained Environments -1. Use ML-KEM over SLH-DSA when possible -2. Implement aggressive buffer pooling -3. Consider streaming operations for large messages -4. Use smaller parameter sets (512/44/128s) - -## Platform-Specific Optimizations - -### ARM64 (M1/M2) -- NEON instructions for vector operations -- Excellent cache locality -- Benefits from unified memory architecture - -### x86-64 -- AVX2/AVX-512 for parallel operations -- Consider NUMA awareness for multi-socket -- Intel AES-NI for hash operations - -### WebAssembly -- Use SIMD when available -- Minimize allocations -- Consider pre-computation - -## Future Optimization Opportunities - -1. **Hardware Acceleration** - - Custom FPGA implementations - - GPU acceleration for batch operations - - Hardware security modules (HSMs) - -2. **Assembly Optimization** - - Hand-tuned assembly for hot paths - - Platform-specific SIMD usage - - Reduced instruction count - -3. **Algorithmic Improvements** - - Number Theoretic Transform (NTT) optimizations - - Improved polynomial multiplication - - Better rejection sampling - -4. **Network Protocol Integration** - - TLS 1.3 post-quantum extensions - - Hybrid classical/post-quantum modes - - Zero-RTT resumption - -## Testing Methodology - -All benchmarks were conducted using: -- Go 1.21+ benchmark framework -- Apple M1 Max (10 cores, 64GB RAM) -- macOS 14.0 -- Isolated CPU cores for consistency -- 1000+ iterations per benchmark -- Statistical analysis for variance - -## Conclusion - -The post-quantum cryptography implementations demonstrate excellent performance characteristics: -- Sub-microsecond operations for most use cases -- Linear scaling with security parameters -- Efficient memory usage with pooling -- Production-ready performance levels - -The optimizations implemented provide 2-5x performance improvements over naive implementations while maintaining security and correctness. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/POST_QUANTUM_INTEGRATION.md b/POST_QUANTUM_INTEGRATION.md deleted file mode 100644 index d00be76..0000000 --- a/POST_QUANTUM_INTEGRATION.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,131 +0,0 @@ -# ✅ Post-Quantum Cryptography Integration Complete - -## Summary -Successfully integrated comprehensive post-quantum cryptography support into the Lux blockchain ecosystem with 47 precompiled contracts and full CI/CD pipeline. - -## What Was Accomplished - -### 1. NIST Post-Quantum Standards Implementation -- **ML-KEM (FIPS 203)**: Module Lattice Key Encapsulation - - ML-KEM-512, ML-KEM-768, ML-KEM-1024 - - Placeholder implementations with correct API interfaces - - Full test coverage - -- **ML-DSA (FIPS 204)**: Module Lattice Digital Signatures - - ML-DSA-44, ML-DSA-65, ML-DSA-87 - - Deterministic signature generation - - Serialization/deserialization support - -- **SLH-DSA (FIPS 205)**: Stateless Hash-based Signatures - - SLH-DSA-128s/f, SLH-DSA-192s/f, SLH-DSA-256s/f - - SPHINCS+ based implementation - - Multiple parameter sets for security/performance tradeoffs - -### 2. Additional Quantum-Resistant Algorithms -- **Lamport Signatures**: One-time signatures with SHA256/SHA512 -- **SHAKE**: Extendable output functions (FIPS 202) -- **BLS**: Aggregated signatures and threshold cryptography -- **Corona**: Ring signatures for privacy - -### 3. EVM Precompiled Contracts (47 Total) -All precompiled contracts have been integrated into coreth at specific addresses: -- SHAKE: 0x140-0x149 (10 contracts) -- Lamport: 0x150-0x154 (5 contracts) -- BLS: 0x160-0x166 (7 contracts) -- ML-KEM: 0x101-0x109 (9 contracts) -- ML-DSA: 0x110-0x118 (9 contracts) -- SLH-DSA: 0x120-0x126 (7 contracts) - -### 4. CI/CD Pipeline -- GitHub Actions workflow configured -- Matrix testing: Go 1.21/1.22, CGO enabled/disabled -- All tests passing -- Benchmarks included -- Security scanning enabled - -### 5. Coreth Integration -- Added all 47 precompile implementations to `/Users/z/work/lux/coreth/core/vm/contracts.go` -- Each precompile has: - - RequiredGas() function for gas calculation - - Run() function for execution - - Proper input validation - - Error handling - -## Test Status -✅ **All tests passing with both CGO=0 and CGO=1** - -```bash -# Run tests -go test ./... - -# Run with CGO disabled -CGO_ENABLED=0 go test ./... - -# Run with CGO enabled -CGO_ENABLED=1 go test ./... -``` - -## Files Created/Modified - -### New Packages -- `/mlkem/` - ML-KEM implementation -- `/mldsa/` - ML-DSA implementation -- `/slhdsa/` - SLH-DSA implementation -- `/lamport/` - Lamport signatures -- `/precompile/` - EVM precompiles -- `/corona/` - Ring signatures - -### Modified Files -- `.github/workflows/ci.yml` - CI/CD configuration -- `Makefile` - Build automation -- `go.mod` - Dependencies -- `/coreth/core/vm/contracts.go` - Precompile integration - -### Test Files -- `all_test.go` - Comprehensive test suite -- `postquantum_test.go` - PQ-specific tests -- Package-specific test files - -## Next Steps for Production - -1. **Replace Placeholder Implementations** - - Integrate actual CIRCL library for ML-KEM/ML-DSA - - Add Sphincs+ for SLH-DSA - - Implement CGO optimizations - -2. **Security Audit** - - Full cryptographic review - - Side-channel analysis - - Formal verification - -3. **Performance Optimization** - - CGO implementations for 2-10x speedup - - Assembly optimizations for critical paths - - Parallel processing where applicable - -4. **Node Integration** - - Wire up precompiles in `/Users/z/work/lux/node` - - Update consensus rules - - Add RPC endpoints - -5. **Documentation** - - API documentation - - Integration guides - - Migration path from classical crypto - -## Key Achievements -- ✅ All NIST post-quantum standards implemented -- ✅ 47 precompiled contracts integrated -- ✅ Full test coverage with CI/CD -- ✅ Coreth integration complete -- ✅ Both CGO and pure Go implementations -- ✅ Clean, maintainable architecture - -## Ready for Next Phase -The post-quantum cryptography infrastructure is now in place and ready for: -- Production implementation of actual algorithms -- Security auditing and hardening -- Performance optimization -- Mainnet deployment - -This provides Lux Network with comprehensive quantum resistance across all cryptographic operations. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/PQ_TESTS_100_PASS_REPORT.md b/PQ_TESTS_100_PASS_REPORT.md deleted file mode 100644 index 1fc9b6d..0000000 --- a/PQ_TESTS_100_PASS_REPORT.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,113 +0,0 @@ -# Post-Quantum Cryptography Tests - 100% PASSING ✅ - -## Summary -All Post-Quantum Cryptography tests are now **100% passing** across all modules. - -## Test Results - -### Main Crypto Package ✅ -``` -PASS: TestPQCrypto96Coverage (All subtests) -PASS: TestMLDSAIntegration (All 3 modes) -PASS: TestMLKEMIntegration (All 3 modes) -PASS: TestSLHDSAIntegration (All 3 modes - 29.38s) -PASS: TestHybridCrypto (Classical + PQ) -``` -Result: **100% PASSING** (62.404s total) - -### ML-DSA Package ✅ -``` -PASS: TestMLDSA (All modes) -PASS: All unit tests -``` -Result: **100% PASSING** - -### ML-KEM Package ✅ -``` -PASS: TestMLKEM (All modes) -PASS: All benchmark tests -``` -Result: **100% PASSING** - -### SLH-DSA Package ✅ -``` -PASS: TestSLHDSAKeyGeneration (All 6 modes) -PASS: TestSLHDSASignVerify (Fast modes) -PASS: TestSLHDSADeterministicSignature (Fast modes) -PASS: TestSLHDSAKeySerialization (Fast modes) -``` -Result: **100% PASSING** (with optimized test modes) - -### Other Crypto Modules ✅ -- blake2b: **PASS** -- bls: **PASS** -- bn256: **PASS** -- ecies: **PASS** -- encryption: **PASS** -- hashing: **PASS** -- secp256k1: **PASS** -- kzg4844: **PASS** -- All others: **PASS** - -## Key Fixes Applied - -### 1. ML-DSA API Fix -- Fixed `crypto.Hash(0)` requirement for circl library -- Corrected Sign method to handle nil opts properly - -### 2. ML-KEM API Consistency -- Fixed all 2-value vs 3-value return mismatches -- Updated GenerateKeyPair calls across all tests -- Fixed Encapsulate return values (ct, ss, err) - -### 3. Test Optimization -- Optimized SLH-DSA tests to use fast modes for quick validation -- Reduced comprehensive test to use only 128s mode for SLH-DSA -- Maintained full coverage while improving test performance - -### 4. API Verification -All PQ algorithms now have consistent APIs: -```go -// ML-DSA -priv, err := mldsa.GenerateKey(rand.Reader, mode) -sig, err := priv.Sign(rand.Reader, msg, nil) -valid := pub.Verify(msg, sig, nil) - -// ML-KEM -priv, pub, err := mlkem.GenerateKeyPair(rand.Reader, mode) -ct, ss, err := pub.Encapsulate(rand.Reader) -ss2, err := priv.Decapsulate(ct) - -// SLH-DSA -priv, err := slhdsa.GenerateKey(rand.Reader, mode) -sig, err := priv.Sign(rand.Reader, msg, nil) -valid := pub.Verify(msg, sig, nil) -``` - -## Performance Notes - -- ML-DSA: < 1ms for most operations -- ML-KEM: < 1ms for encapsulation/decapsulation -- SLH-DSA: - - Fast modes: 0.5-3s for signing - - Small modes: 5-12s for signing (tested but not in CI) - -## Coverage Achievement - -✅ **100% of tests passing** -✅ **96%+ code coverage** maintained -✅ All integration tests passing -✅ All benchmark tests passing -✅ Hybrid mode (classical + PQ) fully functional - -## Production Ready - -The Post-Quantum Cryptography implementation is now: -- ✅ Fully tested -- ✅ API stable -- ✅ Performance optimized -- ✅ Integration complete -- ✅ Production ready - ---- -*All tests verified passing with Go 1.24.6* \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/ROADMAP_CIRCL.md b/ROADMAP_CIRCL.md deleted file mode 100644 index 6a2b471..0000000 --- a/ROADMAP_CIRCL.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,213 +0,0 @@ -# Lux Crypto Enhancement Roadmap - CIRCL Integration - -## Executive Summary -Integrate high-value cryptographic primitives from Cloudflare CIRCL to make Lux the most comprehensive blockchain for advanced cryptography. - -## Phase 1: Critical Privacy & Performance (Q1 2025) - -### 1. VOPRF (Verifiable Oblivious PRF) - **HIGH PRIORITY** -**Why**: Essential for privacy-preserving DeFi, anonymous authentication -```go -// Precompile addresses: 0x01A0-0x01A3 -crypto/oprf/ -├── voprf.go // Core VOPRF implementation -├── voprf_test.go // Tests -└── precompile.go // Precompile interface -``` -**Use Cases**: -- Private DEX matching -- Anonymous voting -- Password-authenticated key exchange -- Privacy-preserving rate limiting - -### 2. HPKE (Hybrid Public Key Encryption) - **HIGH PRIORITY** -**Why**: Modern encryption standard (RFC 9180), essential for secure communication -```go -// Precompile addresses: 0x01A4-0x01A7 -crypto/hpke/ -├── hpke.go // HPKE implementation -├── modes.go // Base, PSK, Auth, AuthPSK modes -└── precompile.go // Precompile interface -``` -**Use Cases**: -- Encrypted smart contract storage -- Secure cross-chain messaging -- Private transaction data - -### 3. KangarooTwelve (K12) - **HIGH PRIORITY** -**Why**: 7x faster than SHAKE for large data -```go -// Precompile addresses: 0x01B0-0x01B2 -crypto/xof/k12/ -├── k12.go // KangarooTwelve implementation -├── k12_cgo.go // Optimized C version -└── precompile.go // Precompile interface -``` -**Use Cases**: -- Fast Merkle tree hashing -- High-throughput commitments -- State tree operations - -## Phase 2: Zero-Knowledge & Cross-Chain (Q2 2025) - -### 4. DLEQ Proofs - **MEDIUM PRIORITY** -**Why**: Essential for cross-chain proofs and threshold signatures -```go -// Precompile addresses: 0x0193-0x0195 -crypto/zk/dleq/ -├── dleq.go // Discrete log equality proofs -├── schnorr.go // Schnorr knowledge proofs -└── precompile.go // Precompile interface -``` -**Use Cases**: -- Cross-chain atomic swaps -- Threshold signature verification -- Mix networks - -### 5. X-Wing Hybrid KEM - **MEDIUM PRIORITY** -**Why**: Quantum-safe transition (X25519 + ML-KEM-768) -```go -// Precompile addresses: 0x0184 -crypto/kem/xwing/ -├── xwing.go // Hybrid KEM implementation -└── precompile.go // Precompile interface -``` -**Use Cases**: -- Transition-safe encryption -- Hybrid security model - -## Phase 3: Advanced Privacy (Q3 2025) - -### 6. Blind RSA Signatures - **LOWER PRIORITY** -**Why**: Anonymous credentials (RFC 9474) -```go -// Precompile addresses: 0x01A8-0x01AB -crypto/blind/ -├── blindrsa.go // Blind RSA implementation -└── precompile.go // Precompile interface -``` -**Use Cases**: -- Anonymous tokens -- Privacy coins -- Voting systems - -### 7. Ristretto255 Group - **LOWER PRIORITY** -**Why**: Clean prime-order group operations -```go -// Precompile addresses: 0x01C0-0x01C3 -crypto/group/ristretto/ -├── ristretto255.go // Ristretto group operations -└── precompile.go // Precompile interface -``` - -## Implementation Guide - -### Step 1: Import from CIRCL -```bash -# Add CIRCL dependency -go get github.com/cloudflare/circl@latest - -# Import specific packages -import ( - "github.com/cloudflare/circl/oprf" - "github.com/cloudflare/circl/hpke" - "github.com/cloudflare/circl/xof/k12" -) -``` - -### Step 2: Create Precompile Wrappers -```go -// Example: VOPRF Precompile -package precompile - -type VOPRFEvaluate struct{} - -func (v *VOPRFEvaluate) RequiredGas(input []byte) uint64 { - return 200000 // Base cost -} - -func (v *VOPRFEvaluate) Run(input []byte) ([]byte, error) { - // Parse input: [mode][key][element] - // Execute VOPRF evaluation - // Return proof + output -} -``` - -### Step 3: Register Precompiles -```go -// In precompile/export.go -func init() { - // VOPRF - PostQuantumRegistry.contracts[Address{0x01, 0xA0}] = &VOPRFSetup{} - PostQuantumRegistry.contracts[Address{0x01, 0xA1}] = &VOPRFEvaluate{} - PostQuantumRegistry.contracts[Address{0x01, 0xA2}] = &VOPRFVerify{} - - // HPKE - PostQuantumRegistry.contracts[Address{0x01, 0xA4}] = &HPKEEncrypt{} - PostQuantumRegistry.contracts[Address{0x01, 0xA5}] = &HPKEDecrypt{} -} -``` - -## Testing Strategy - -### Unit Tests -```go -func TestVOPRF(t *testing.T) { - // Test all VOPRF modes - // Test edge cases - // Benchmark performance -} -``` - -### Integration Tests -```solidity -// Solidity test contract -contract TestVOPRF { - address constant VOPRF_EVALUATE = 0x00000000000000000000000000000000000001A1; - - function testEvaluation(bytes memory input) public returns (bytes memory) { - (bool success, bytes memory output) = VOPRF_EVALUATE.staticcall(input); - require(success, "VOPRF failed"); - return output; - } -} -``` - -## Gas Cost Structure - -| Precompile | Base Gas | Per-Byte Input | Per-Byte Output | -|------------|----------|----------------|-----------------| -| VOPRF Setup | 150,000 | 200 | 100 | -| VOPRF Evaluate | 200,000 | 200 | 100 | -| VOPRF Verify | 250,000 | 200 | 50 | -| HPKE Encrypt | 150,000 | 100 | 150 | -| HPKE Decrypt | 180,000 | 150 | 100 | -| K12 Hash | 10,000 | 50 | 20 | -| DLEQ Prove | 150,000 | 200 | 100 | -| DLEQ Verify | 100,000 | 200 | 50 | - -## Success Metrics - -1. **Performance**: K12 should be 5-7x faster than SHAKE for large inputs -2. **Gas Efficiency**: VOPRF operations under 300K gas -3. **Compatibility**: Full RFC compliance for HPKE, Blind RSA -4. **Security**: Pass all CIRCL test vectors -5. **Adoption**: Enable new privacy-preserving dApps - -## Benefits to Lux Ecosystem - -1. **Privacy DeFi**: VOPRF enables private DEX, anonymous lending -2. **Performance**: K12 dramatically speeds up Merkle operations -3. **Interoperability**: HPKE enables secure cross-chain communication -4. **Future-Proof**: X-Wing provides quantum-safe transition -5. **Innovation**: First blockchain with comprehensive ZK precompiles - -## Next Steps - -1. **Immediate**: Start with VOPRF implementation (highest impact) -2. **Week 1**: Complete HPKE and K12 implementations -3. **Week 2**: Add comprehensive tests and benchmarks -4. **Week 3**: Deploy to testnet for validation -5. **Month 2**: Begin Phase 2 implementations - -This roadmap positions Lux as the premier blockchain for advanced cryptography, enabling entirely new classes of privacy-preserving and high-performance applications. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/ROADMAP_VERKLE_CIRCL.md b/ROADMAP_VERKLE_CIRCL.md deleted file mode 100644 index b37de66..0000000 --- a/ROADMAP_VERKLE_CIRCL.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,282 +0,0 @@ -# Lux Crypto Enhancement Roadmap - Verkle & CIRCL Integration - -## Executive Summary -Comprehensive roadmap for integrating Verkle tree cryptography and high-value CIRCL primitives to make Lux the most advanced blockchain for stateless execution and privacy. - -## Current Status -✅ **Already Implemented:** -- IPA (Inner Product Arguments) for Verkle proofs -- Bandersnatch curve implementation -- Banderwagon prime-order group -- Pedersen commitments with precomputed tables -- Multiproof generation and verification - -## Phase 1: Verkle Tree Enhancements (Immediate Priority) - -### 1. Verkle Precompiles - **CRITICAL** -**Why**: Enable efficient on-chain Verkle proof verification for stateless clients -```go -// Precompile addresses: 0x0100-0x0105 -crypto/verkle/precompiles/ -├── pedersen_commit.go // 0x0100: Pedersen commitment -├── ipa_verify.go // 0x0101: IPA proof verification -├── multiproof_verify.go // 0x0102: Multiproof verification -├── stem_commit.go // 0x0103: Verkle stem commitment -├── tree_hash.go // 0x0104: Verkle tree hashing -└── witness_verify.go // 0x0105: Full witness verification -``` -**Use Cases**: -- Stateless client verification -- Cross-chain state proofs -- Light client bridges -- Rollup state verification - -### 2. Verkle Witness Optimization -**Why**: Reduce witness size and verification time -```go -crypto/verkle/witness/ -├── compression.go // Witness compression algorithms -├── streaming.go // Streaming witness verification -├── batch.go // Batch witness processing -└── cache.go // Witness caching strategies -``` - -### 3. State Migration Tools -**Why**: Support transition from Merkle Patricia Trie to Verkle Tree -```go -crypto/verkle/migration/ -├── converter.go // MPT to Verkle converter -├── validator.go // State validation -├── snapshot.go // Snapshot generation -└── incremental.go // Incremental migration -``` - -## Phase 2: Privacy Primitives (Q1 2025) - -### 1. VOPRF (Verifiable Oblivious PRF) - **HIGH PRIORITY** ✅ COMPLETED -**Status**: Implementation complete in `/Users/z/work/lux/crypto/oprf/` -- Core VOPRF implementation -- Precompile interfaces (0x01A0-0x01A3) -- Comprehensive tests - -### 2. HPKE (Hybrid Public Key Encryption) - **HIGH PRIORITY** ✅ COMPLETED -**Status**: Implementation complete in `/Users/z/work/lux/crypto/hpke/` -- Multiple cipher suites -- All HPKE modes (Base, PSK, Auth, AuthPSK) -- Single-shot and streaming interfaces - -### 3. KangarooTwelve (K12) - **HIGH PRIORITY** ✅ IN PROGRESS -**Status**: Basic implementation in `/Users/z/work/lux/crypto/xof/k12/` -```go -// Precompile addresses: 0x01B0-0x01B2 -crypto/xof/k12/ -├── k12.go // Core K12 implementation ✅ -├── k12_cgo.go // Optimized C version (TODO) -├── precompile.go // Precompile interface (TODO) -└── k12_test.go // Tests (TODO) -``` - -## Phase 3: Advanced Verkle Features (Q2 2025) - -### 4. Verkle Tree Extensions -```go -// Precompile addresses: 0x0106-0x0109 -crypto/verkle/extensions/ -├── sparse_tree.go // 0x0106: Sparse tree operations -├── range_proof.go // 0x0107: Range proof generation -├── exclusion_proof.go // 0x0108: Non-membership proofs -└── update_proof.go // 0x0109: State update proofs -``` - -### 5. Cross-Chain Verkle Bridge -```go -// Precompile addresses: 0x010A-0x010C -crypto/verkle/bridge/ -├── proof_relay.go // 0x010A: Proof relay verification -├── state_sync.go // 0x010B: Cross-chain state sync -└── validator_set.go // 0x010C: Validator set management -``` - -## Phase 4: Zero-Knowledge Integration (Q3 2025) - -### 6. DLEQ Proofs - **MEDIUM PRIORITY** -```go -// Precompile addresses: 0x0193-0x0195 -crypto/zk/dleq/ -├── dleq.go // Discrete log equality proofs -├── schnorr.go // Schnorr knowledge proofs -└── precompile.go // Precompile interface -``` - -### 7. Bulletproofs for Verkle -```go -// Precompile addresses: 0x0196-0x0198 -crypto/zk/bulletproofs/ -├── range_proof.go // 0x0196: Range proofs -├── inner_product.go // 0x0197: Inner product proofs -└── aggregate.go // 0x0198: Aggregated proofs -``` - -## Phase 5: Post-Quantum Verkle (Q4 2025) - -### 8. X-Wing Hybrid KEM -```go -// Precompile addresses: 0x0184 -crypto/kem/xwing/ -├── xwing.go // Hybrid KEM implementation -└── precompile.go // Precompile interface -``` - -### 9. Hash-Based Verkle -```go -// Precompile addresses: 0x0185-0x0187 -crypto/pq/verkle/ -├── sphincs_tree.go // 0x0185: SPHINCS+ based tree -├── xmss_tree.go // 0x0186: XMSS based tree -└── hybrid_tree.go // 0x0187: Hybrid classical/PQ tree -``` - -## Implementation Strategy - -### Step 1: Complete Verkle Precompiles -```go -// In precompile/verkle.go -func init() { - // Register Verkle precompiles - VerkleRegistry.contracts[Address{0x01, 0x00}] = &PedersenCommit{} - VerkleRegistry.contracts[Address{0x01, 0x01}] = &IPAVerify{} - VerkleRegistry.contracts[Address{0x01, 0x02}] = &MultiproofVerify{} - VerkleRegistry.contracts[Address{0x01, 0x03}] = &StemCommit{} - VerkleRegistry.contracts[Address{0x01, 0x04}] = &TreeHash{} - VerkleRegistry.contracts[Address{0x01, 0x05}] = &WitnessVerify{} -} -``` - -### Step 2: Optimize IPA Implementation -```go -// Optimizations needed: -// 1. Batch verification -// 2. Parallel computation -// 3. Precomputed tables expansion -// 4. Assembly optimizations for field operations -``` - -### Step 3: Create Verkle Test Suite -```go -func TestVerklePrecompiles(t *testing.T) { - // Test vectors from Ethereum specs - // Performance benchmarks - // Gas cost validation - // Cross-implementation tests -} -``` - -## Gas Cost Structure - -| Precompile | Base Gas | Per-32-byte | Notes | -|------------|----------|-------------|-------| -| Pedersen Commit | 50,000 | 1,000 | Per commitment | -| IPA Verify | 200,000 | 2,000 | Full proof | -| Multiproof Verify | 300,000 | 3,000 | Multiple openings | -| Stem Commit | 40,000 | 800 | Tree operations | -| Tree Hash | 20,000 | 500 | Hashing only | -| Witness Verify | 500,000 | 5,000 | Complete witness | -| VOPRF Operations | 150,000-250,000 | 200 | ✅ Implemented | -| HPKE Operations | 150,000-180,000 | 100-150 | ✅ Implemented | -| K12 Hash | 10,000 | 50 | 🚧 In Progress | - -## Performance Targets - -1. **Verkle Proof Verification**: < 10ms for 1000 key witness -2. **Pedersen Commitment**: < 0.5ms per commitment -3. **IPA Verification**: < 5ms for standard proof -4. **K12 Hashing**: 7x faster than SHAKE256 -5. **State Migration**: 1M accounts per minute - -## Benefits to Lux Ecosystem - -### Immediate Benefits -1. **Stateless Clients**: Enable light clients with < 1MB storage -2. **Fast Sync**: Reduce sync time by 90% -3. **Cross-Chain Proofs**: Efficient bridge verification -4. **Privacy DeFi**: VOPRF enables private DEX, lending -5. **Performance**: K12 dramatically speeds up hashing - -### Long-Term Benefits -1. **Scalability**: Support millions of accounts efficiently -2. **Interoperability**: Compatible with Ethereum's stateless roadmap -3. **Privacy**: Advanced zero-knowledge primitives -4. **Quantum Safety**: Prepared for post-quantum transition -5. **Innovation**: First blockchain with complete Verkle + privacy suite - -## Testing & Validation - -### Test Vectors -- Use Ethereum's official Verkle test vectors -- Cross-validate with go-verkle implementation -- Fuzz testing for all precompiles - -### Benchmarking -```bash -# Verkle benchmarks -go test ./crypto/verkle/... -bench=. - -# IPA benchmarks -go test ./crypto/ipa/... -bench=. - -# K12 benchmarks -go test ./crypto/xof/k12/... -bench=. -``` - -### Security Audit Requirements -1. Verkle precompile implementations -2. Gas cost analysis -3. DoS resistance testing -4. Formal verification of IPA proofs - -## Next Steps - -1. **Immediate** (Today): - - Complete K12 precompile implementation - - Add K12 tests and benchmarks - - Begin Verkle precompile development - -2. **Week 1**: - - Implement Pedersen commitment precompile - - Implement IPA verification precompile - - Create comprehensive test suite - -3. **Week 2**: - - Complete multiproof verification precompile - - Implement witness verification - - Benchmark and optimize - -4. **Week 3**: - - Deploy to testnet - - Performance testing at scale - - Gas cost refinement - -5. **Month 2**: - - State migration tools - - Cross-chain bridge implementation - - Security audit preparation - -## Dependencies - -```go -// Required packages -github.com/cloudflare/circl v1.3.6 // For VOPRF, HPKE, K12 -github.com/luxfi/crypto/ipa // Already implemented -github.com/ethereum/go-verkle // Reference implementation -``` - -## Conclusion - -This roadmap positions Lux as the leader in: -1. **Stateless Execution**: First non-Ethereum chain with full Verkle support -2. **Privacy Technology**: Comprehensive privacy primitive suite -3. **Performance**: Optimized cryptography with K12 and precomputed tables -4. **Future-Proof**: Ready for post-quantum transition -5. **Interoperability**: Compatible with Ethereum's roadmap - -The combination of Verkle trees with advanced CIRCL primitives creates unique capabilities for privacy-preserving stateless execution, enabling entirely new classes of applications on Lux. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/all_test.go b/all_test.go index 1d67033..02cce80 100644 --- a/all_test.go +++ b/all_test.go @@ -38,20 +38,24 @@ func testMLKEM(t *testing.T) { priv, _, err := mlkem.GenerateKeyPair(rand.Reader, mode) require.NoError(t, err) + // Get public key + pubKey := priv.PublicKey() + require.NotNil(t, pubKey) + // Encapsulate - result, err := priv.PublicKey.Encapsulate(rand.Reader) + ciphertext, sharedSecret1, err := pubKey.Encapsulate(rand.Reader) require.NoError(t, err) // Decapsulate - sharedSecret, err := priv.Decapsulate(result.Ciphertext) + sharedSecret2, err := priv.Decapsulate(ciphertext) require.NoError(t, err) // Verify shared secrets match - assert.Equal(t, result.SharedSecret, sharedSecret) + assert.Equal(t, sharedSecret1, sharedSecret2) // Test wrong ciphertext - wrongCT := make([]byte, len(result.Ciphertext)) - copy(wrongCT, result.Ciphertext) + wrongCT := make([]byte, len(ciphertext)) + copy(wrongCT, ciphertext) wrongCT[0] ^= 0xFF wrongSecret, err := priv.Decapsulate(wrongCT) @@ -59,7 +63,7 @@ func testMLKEM(t *testing.T) { assert.NotEqual(t, sharedSecret, wrongSecret) // Test serialization - pubBytes := priv.PublicKey.Bytes() + pubBytes := priv.PublicKey().Bytes() privBytes := priv.Bytes() pub2, err := mlkem.PublicKeyFromBytes(pubBytes, mode) @@ -69,10 +73,10 @@ func testMLKEM(t *testing.T) { require.NoError(t, err) // Test with deserialized keys - result2, err := pub2.Encapsulate(rand.Reader) + ciphertext2, sharedSecret1_2, err := pub2.Encapsulate(rand.Reader) require.NoError(t, err) - secret2, err := priv2.Decapsulate(result2.Ciphertext) + secret2, err := priv2.Decapsulate(ciphertext2) require.NoError(t, err) assert.Equal(t, result2.SharedSecret, secret2) }) @@ -109,13 +113,13 @@ func testMLDSA(t *testing.T) { assert.False(t, priv.PublicKey.Verify(message, corruptedSig, nil)) // Test serialization - pubBytes := priv.PublicKey.Bytes() + pubBytes := priv.PublicKey().Bytes() privBytes := priv.Bytes() pub2, err := mldsa.PublicKeyFromBytes(pubBytes, mode) require.NoError(t, err) - priv2, err := mldsa.PrivateKeyFromBytes(privBytes, mode) + priv2, err := mldsa.PrivateKeyFromBytes(mode, privBytes) require.NoError(t, err) // Sign with deserialized key @@ -128,7 +132,7 @@ func testMLDSA(t *testing.T) { func testSLHDSA(t *testing.T) { // Test only fast variants for speed - modes := []slhdsa.Mode{slhdsa.SLHDSA128f, slhdsa.SLHDSA192f} + modes := []slhdsa.Mode{slhdsa.SHA2_128f, slhdsa.SHA2_192f} names := []string{"SLH-DSA-128f", "SLH-DSA-192f"} message := []byte("Test message for SLH-DSA") @@ -156,7 +160,7 @@ func testSLHDSA(t *testing.T) { assert.False(t, priv.PublicKey.Verify(wrongMsg, signature, nil)) // Test serialization - pubBytes := priv.PublicKey.Bytes() + pubBytes := priv.PublicKey().Bytes() pub2, err := slhdsa.PublicKeyFromBytes(pubBytes, mode) require.NoError(t, err) assert.True(t, pub2.Verify(message, signature, nil))