Files
zeekay b72f9edb80 message: prove the op table is a bijection onto the router op space
Kills the bug CLASS behind the α-of-K finality wedge (v1.30.65), not just the
one Gossip instance. The chain router (node/chain_router.go) forwards an inbound
message only if message.ToConsensusOp maps it, then dispatches on the router op;
the node op table and the consensus router op enum are two halves of ONE routing
contract. When they diverged — router.Gossip existed but no node op mapped to it
— every broadcast vote was dropped as "unhandled message op" and finality
wedged, with nothing to catch it.

- ToConsensusOp now returns the router constants (byte(router.Get) ...) instead
  of 0..11 magic numbers, so values cannot drift and the table reads as the
  correspondence it is. Bumps consensus v1.25.29 -> v1.25.30 (adds router.NumOps,
  the single source of truth for the op count).

- message/ops_test.go TestToConsensusOp_TableAlignedWithRouter is now EXHAUSTIVE
  and BIDIRECTIONAL: it reconstructs the inverse mapping over the whole node op
  space and requires a bijection onto [0, router.NumOps). A router op with no
  node preimage (the original bug), a collision, a wrong target, or a stray
  mapping all go RED. Pinned to router.NumOps, so a future op added to one table
  but not the other fails the test instead of at runtime. Proven RED against the
  original bug (drop the GossipOp case -> router.Gossip loses its preimage ->
  fail); folds in the old Gossip-specific and hand-listed table checks.

Build rc=0 (GOWORK=off go build ./...); message tests green; finality fix
(GossipOp -> router.Gossip -> blockHandler.Gossip) unchanged and still covered.
2026-06-25 22:10:09 -07:00
..